Re: AT&T didnt Compete - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
BF69 join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN	reply to NewMariner Re: AT&T didnt Compete said by NewMariner : At&t didnt compete with Bellsouth. Thats why the merger went through. It didnt reduce the number of companies providing service. Comcast wants to buy out the competition. Thus, reducing the number of providers... And Comcast doesn't compete with TW, Charter or Cox. Hardly anyone lives in an area where there are 2 cable companies. Comcast competes with DirectTV which is allowed to have more than 30% of the TV market. If DirectTv had 50 million subscribrs would the FCC be stepping in and preventing that? No. If at&t or verizon had 50 million Tv subscrinbers would the FCC be trying to stop that? No. So exactly what is the difference?
BF69 join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN	to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-14 09:50:12 ·
KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK	The difference is: They are Telcos, and Charter is a Cable Co. Which is to say, none really. Except: Martin's bias.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-03-14 23:13:08 ·


Monday, 06-Oct 20:20:49	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com. page compression OFF