Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway » Are you serious?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Oh my poor little chirldren.  
AuthorAll Replies

backness

join:2005-07-08
K2P OW2
reply to L337
Re: Are you serious?

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

That about sums up the whole thing for me.

hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

said by backness See Profile :

...
hmmm.... why would the data holders not want the information to be public?
because it would expose the gaping holes in coverage that exist and would show how little competition there is.

In the major metro area where I live, there is RCN, Verizon, Comcast and who knows how many small providers - at my house, I have one choice for broadband, comcast. It is highly likely, however, that the FCC data for my county probably shows "several" providers available.


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast


edit:
June 20th, @04:27PM

reply to backness
said by backness See Profile :

I don't really see why this is an issue... the providers in question know which areas are served and which aren't.

And so does anyone who wants to bother to find it. So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?

»www.speedtest.net/global.php
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

So why should the FCC spend taxpayer dollars to get info that is already available to anyone who wants it?
If it's "readily available" (and I don't think it is), then the FCC shouldn't need to spend much, if any money to get it, should they?

The FCC needs that information in order to ensure compliance with the 1996 Telecomm Act. Which is, of course, why Martin is loathe to determine accurate penetration data: if such data showed the broadband wasn't being deployeed in a timely manner, the Telecomm Act would compell the FCC to actually do something about it, and that's something he wants to avoid at all costs. Ideology always triumphs over reality.

All that website shows is what ISP's serve a given city.
Forums » Yeah, Who Wants Accurate Broadband Stats Anyway« Oh my poor little chirldren.  


Wednesday, 03-Dec 17:52:36 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] AT&T Metered Billing Trial Hits Second Market
· [95] UDP BitTorrent Will Destroy The Interwebs!
· [87] EFF Challenges Telecom Immunity
· [83] Exclusive Screens Of Comcast's New Bandwidth Meter
· [61] Comcast Tries To Slow Verizon's Philly Entry
· [57] Comcast To Offer Bandwidth Use Tracker In January
· [50] T-Mobile Invisible Caps Return
· [46] App Simplifies Free AT&T iPhone Wi-Fi
· [44] Verizon Tops Consumer Reports Wireless Satisfaction Ratings
· [42] Cablevision Bumps HD Count To 68
Most people now reading
· [Rant] Beeping at BestBuy [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Digital Transport Adapter Unboxing Photos [Comcast Cable TV]
· Is this a good thing for the net? [news,99366]
· [Rant] Bestbuy receipt checker [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· Level 80 PVP gear info? [World of Warcraft]
· Coalition Government Possible? [TekSavvy]
· Maggots on the kitchen ceiling So Gross. Need Help!! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [OC] Q9550 + Asus P5Q Pro [Overclocking/Modding]