Search:  

 






how-to block ads



Member review of HughesNet Satellite Broadband


News tagged to this company
more information on the company
Full HughesNet Satellite Broadband Forum

Reviews:
read 810 reviews (147 positive) (414 negative)
If you wish to review this company, email reviews@dslreports.com
login for new review notification feature
Six Month Rating

Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Mail,DNS,News:
Value for money:


Speed test results 3 year trend

Review by dMarks See Profile
UPDATED: 197 days ago
member for 1.9 years, 707 visits, last login: a few hours ago


Leslie,Ingham,MI
Contract price not specified.
"When it actually works as it should, it's great"
"Rarely works like it should"
"Unless you have to do large downloads on a regular basis, stick with dial-up"
Pre Sales information:
Install Co-ordination:
Connection reliability:
Tech Support:
Mail,DNS,News:
Value for money:
(ratings match consensus)

    I live in an area where the only options are satellite and dial-up. Been with dial-up for a long time and went with a 1-way satellite system through StarConnect. Used that for a bit, worked great except if I downloaded over 2GB in a month my account was frozen until I called and had them turn it back on.

    Decided in February to go with Hughes. Got the Home Plan. Installation went good. That's about all that did go good. After a few weeks I ended up contacting my state's attorney general to get Hughes to give me the speeds I should have been getting from the start. You know it's bad when dial-up can download a 50MB file faster than the supposed broadband satellite connection.

    After Hughes contacted me about the AG complaint, they got me set up right and I was seeing constant near-plan speeds. I upgraded to Pro Plan just to get the extra download threshold since I was going to use it now. All went great for a little over a month, and now I'm almost back to where I started from with really poor speeds during a considerable portion of the day.

    I will never, ever recommend HughesNet to anyone. Nobody needs to be put through all that BS.

    EDIT: I may have to update my review soon. My transponder was switched without any notification, but it appears as if my service has gotten better. Haven't had any slowdowns or anything since the switch. I'll give it a month to see how stable it remains.

    UPDATE: As of a few months ago I have dropped HughesNet in favor of Millenicom Wireless internet. Even though I'm on the fringe of coverage, I couldn't be any happier with the switch. Even with low signal I get so much better performance than I ever did with Hughes.

    Buyer beware, get Hughes at your own risk. Dial-up may be the 'stone age' of internet, but you may be better off until something better comes along

    Followup comments:

    badday

    @direcpc.com

    Hughes

    I have been with Direcway- now Hughes since 11/2005 - It has been a nightmare the entire time. The installation had to be redone as the 1st time it was so bad & now that Hughes bought out direcway they have implemented the "Fair access policy". I get less than dial up speeds when I have hit the download threshold of 350MB, and I do not get speed back for at least 24 hours. I usually get between 200 kbps and 860 kbps when not subject to FAP and I pay 69.95 for the pro plan of 1MG speed - but they say they only have to supply a minimum of 500 kbps. Also the speed test they have you run from their site reads faster than from this site ( today Hughes speed test said 868 & this site said 564. I had DSL before I moved, so I know what speed are suppose to be! - BS is putting it lightly - I have no other options, but dial up would be more reliable & a lot less money.
    Forums » comments on review of HughesNet Satellite Broadband


Tuesday, 06-Jan 16:52:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole